4.6 Article

Case Report: Endoscopic manifestations and clinical features of small intestinal lymphangioma-A report of two cases

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916295

关键词

case report; small intestinal lymphangioma; surgical treatment; clinical features; capsule endoscopy; enteroscopy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the clinical characteristics, auxiliary examinations, and treatment measures of small intestinal lymphangioma in order to enhance clinicians' diagnostic ability. Two cases of small intestinal lymphangioma from the Department of Gastroenterology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were reported and comprehensively analyzed. The results showed that capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy were valuable for clinical diagnosis, while surgery achieved better outcomes.
ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to analyze the clinical characteristics, auxiliary examinations, and treatment measures of small intestinal lymphangioma and to improve the clinical diagnostic ability of clinicians. MethodsThis paper reports two cases of small intestinal lymphangioma in the Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and makes a comprehensive analysis. ResultsA 31-year-old woman went to the hospital with complaints of dizziness, fatigue, and anemia. A 52-year-old woman complained of upper abdominal pain and went to the hospital with abdominal pain awaiting investigation. Both patients were subjected to three major routine examinations, tumor complete set, CT, capsule endoscopy, and deep enteroscopy, and both of them underwent complete resection of the affected intestinal segment. Pathology showed that both patients had small intestinal lymphangioma. ConclusionsThe clinical manifestations of small intestinal lymphangioma lack specificity. Capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy are helpful for clinical diagnosis, and pathological examination is still the gold standard. Surgical treatment can achieve better results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据