4.6 Review

Exploring the landscape of immunotherapy approaches in sarcomas

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1069963

关键词

sarcoma; bone sarcoma; soft tissue sarcoma; immunotherapy; checkpoint inhibitors; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma UPS

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sarcomas are a diverse group of malignant tumors that arise from mesenchymal tissue and account for 1% of adult malignancies. Surgical excision and conventional chemotherapy are the mainstay of treatment for local and advanced disease, respectively. Immunotherapy has shown promise in multiple cancers, but its efficacy in sarcomas remains uncertain. Clinical trials and studies are ongoing to determine the role of immunotherapy in specific sarcoma subtypes.
Sarcomas comprise a heterogenous group of malignancies, of more than 100 different entities, arising from mesenchymal tissue, and accounting for 1% of adult malignancies. Surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy constitute the therapeutic armamentarium against sarcomas, with surgical excision and conventional chemotherapy, remaining the mainstay of treatment for local and advanced disease, respectively. The prognosis for patients with metastatic disease is dismal and novel therapeutic approaches are urgently required to improve survival outcomes. Immunotherapy, is a rapidly evolving field in oncology, which has been successfully applied in multiple cancers to date. Immunomodulating antibodies, adoptive cellular therapy, cancer vaccines, and cytokines have been tested in patients with different types of sarcomas through clinical trials, pilot studies, retrospective and prospective studies. The results of these studies regarding the efficacy of different types of immunotherapies in sarcomas are conflicting, and the application of immunotherapy in daily clinical practice remains limited. Additional clinical studies are ongoing in an effort to delineate the role of immunotherapy in patients with specific sarcoma subtypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据