4.7 Article

Temperature- and Ambient Pressure-Independent Sensing of Hydrogen in Fluids Using Cascaded Interferometers Incorporated in Optical Fibers

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202201273

关键词

cascaded interferometer; hydrogen sensor; optical sensor; temperature independent sensor; transformer oil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article demonstrates a fiber-optic hydrogen sensor with high sensitivity, selectivity, and reliability. It can accurately monitor hydrogen in liquid fluid and operates independently of temperature and pressure.
Practical gas sensors are indispensable for the healthy operation of cutting-edge hydrogen-based systems. An optical fiber-based hydrogen sensor incorporating a robust Fabry-Perot interferometric structure on a fiber tip with high sensitivity, selectivity, and reliability of operation and a micrometer-scale footprint is demonstrated. The hydrogen-sensitive volume expansion of palladium provides bi-metal operation with a silicon nitride mirror to tune the interferometer cavity and therefore the resonance modes by switching the mirror form factor from a flat to convex shape. It does not require any peripherals, including a power supply or data communication modules. In addition to fiber-inherent advantages, such as remote and multiplexed monitoring without electromagnetic field interference, the sensor guarantees temperature- and pressure-independent operation by adding a simple glass sub-cavity and microwindows in the mirror layer, respectively. Critically, the sensor highlights reliable operation in a liquid fluid (electrical transformer oil) to monitor hydrogen as its damage marker escaping from a mechanical shield or selective gas screen. The detection limit, sensitivity, and response time of the sensor under atmospheric conditions are 15 ppm, 29.6 nm/%, and 12.5 s, respectively. In addition, the unimpaired operation of the sensor in 60 degrees C transformer oil is verified experimentally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据