4.6 Review

Engineering Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants through CRISPR Genome Editing

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11223590

关键词

CRISPR; drought; salinity; heat; heavy metals; field crops; sustainable agriculture

资金

  1. Pakistan Science Foundation [PSF/NSFC-AGR/P-NIBGE(12)]
  2. Punjab Agriculture Research Board (Punjab), Pakistan [PARB-20-206]
  3. International Centre for Genome Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental abiotic stresses pose a threat to food security, while the CRISPR gene editing technology can be used to develop stress-tolerant crop varieties and increase crop yield.
Environmental abiotic stresses challenge food security by depressing crop yields often exceeding 50% of their annual production. Different methods, including conventional as well as genomic-assisted breeding, mutagenesis, and genetic engineering have been utilized to enhance stress resilience in several crop species. Plant breeding has been partly successful in developing crop varieties against abiotic stresses owning to the complex genetics of the traits as well as the narrow genetic base in the germplasm. Irrespective of the fact that genetic engineering can transfer gene(s) from any organism(s), transgenic crops have become controversial mainly due to the potential risk of transgene-outcrossing. Consequently, the cultivation of transgenic crops is banned in certain countries, particularly in European countries. In this scenario, the discovery of the CRISPR tool provides a platform for producing transgene-free genetically edited plants-similar to the mutagenized crops that are not extensively regulated such as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Thus, the genome-edited plants without a transgene would likely go into the field without any restriction. Here, we focused on the deployment of CRISPR for the successful development of abiotic stress-tolerant crop plants for sustaining crop productivity under changing environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据