4.6 Article

Proteomic Landscape of Human Spermatozoa: Optimized Extraction Method and Application

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11244064

关键词

spermatozoa; extraction method; antibiotic; proteomics; mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the proteomics of human spermatozoa exposed to various stressors and investigates different protein extraction methods. The results suggest that the use of urea buffer combined with ultrasonication provides the most comprehensive coverage of the sperm proteome. Furthermore, the study finds that antibiotics may have an impact on sperm quality.
Human spermatozoa proteomics exposed to some physical, biological or chemical stressors is being explored. However, there is a lack of optimized sample preparation methods to achieve in-depth protein coverage for sperm cells. Meanwhile, it is not clear whether antibiotics can regulate proteins to affect sperm quality. Here, we systematically compared a total of six different protein extraction methods based the combination of three commonly used lysis buffers and physical lysis strategies. The urea buffer combined with ultrasonication (UA-ultrasonication) produced the highest protein extraction rate, leading to the deepest coverage of human sperm proteome (5685 protein groups) from healthy human sperm samples. Since the antibiotics, amoxicillin and clarithromycin, have been widely used against H. pylori infection, we conduct a longitudinal study of sperm proteome via data-independent acquisition tandem mass spectrometry (DIA-MS/MS) on an infected patient during on and off therapy with these two drugs. The semen examination and morphological analysis were performed combined with proteomics analysis. Our results indicated that antibiotics may cause an increase in the sperm concentration and the rate of malformed sperm and disrupt proteome expression in sperm. This work provides an optimized extraction method to characterize the in-depth human sperm proteome and to extend its clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据