4.6 Review

Exploring the Tryptophan Metabolic Pathways in Migraine-Related Mechanisms

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11233795

关键词

primary headaches; migraine; tryptophan; serotonin pathway; kynurenic pathway; serotonin; melatonin; kynurenic acid; PACAP; CGRP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Migraine is a complex neurovascular disorder with unclear pathophysiology and limited therapeutic options. Recent research has focused on tryptophan metabolism, which produces neuroactive molecules that affect pain processing and stress response. This review summarizes translational and clinical findings, as well as potential therapeutic options for the prevention and treatment of migraine.
Migraine is a complex neurovascular disorder, which causes intense socioeconomic problems worldwide. The pathophysiology of disease is enigmatic; accordingly, therapy is not sufficient. In recent years, migraine research focused on tryptophan, which is metabolized via two main pathways, the serotonin and kynurenine pathways, both of which produce neuroactive molecules that influence pain processing and stress response by disturbing neural and brain hypersensitivity and by interacting with molecules that control vascular and inflammatory actions. Serotonin has a role in trigeminal pain processing, and melatonin, which is another product of this pathway, also has a role in these processes. One of the end products of the kynurenine pathway is kynurenic acid (KYNA), which can decrease the overexpression of migraine-related neuropeptides in experimental conditions. However, the ability of KYNA to cross the blood-brain barrier is minimal, necessitating the development of synthetic analogs with potentially better pharmacokinetic properties to exploit its therapeutic potential. This review summarizes the main translational and clinical findings on tryptophan metabolism and certain neuropeptides, as well as therapeutic options that may be useful in the prevention and treatment of migraine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据