4.6 Review

A Structural View at Vaccine Development against M. tuberculosis

期刊

CELLS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12020317

关键词

tuberculosis; vaccine; protein; structure; immune response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuberculosis remains the leading infectious bacterial cause of death worldwide. Developing a new vaccine with better coverage than the current BCG vaccine is vital to stop its spread. Structural Vaccinology and the development of vaccine adjuvants can enhance the immunostimulating effects of subunit vaccines, accelerating the development of a safer and more effective tuberculosis vaccine.
Tuberculosis (TB) is still the leading global cause of death from an infectious bacterial agent. Limiting tuberculosis epidemic spread is therefore an urgent global public health priority. As stated by the WHO, to stop the spread of the disease we need a new vaccine, with better coverage than the current Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine. This vaccine was first used in 1921 and, since then, there are still no new licensed tuberculosis vaccines. However, there is extremely active research in the field, with a steep acceleration in the past decades, due to the advance of technologies and more rational vaccine design strategies. This review aims to gather latest updates in vaccine development in the various clinical phases and to underline the contribution of Structural Vaccinology (SV) to the development of safer and effective antigens. In particular, SV and the development of vaccine adjuvants is making the use of subunit vaccines, which are the safest albeit the less antigenic ones, an achievable goal. Indeed, subunit vaccines overcome safety concerns but need to be rationally re-engineered to enhance their immunostimulating effects. The larger availability of antigen structural information as well as a better understanding of the complex host immune response to TB infection is a strong premise for a further acceleration of TB vaccine development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据