4.6 Review

MHC Class II Presentation in Autoimmunity

期刊

CELLS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12020314

关键词

autoimmune diseases; autoreactive T cells; human leukocyte antigen; major histocompatibility complex; negative selection; central tolerance; thymus; antigen presentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antigen presentation by MHC-II is crucial for immune response and self-antigen tolerance. Certain MHC-II alleles are associated with autoimmune diseases. The process of MHC-II-mediated presentation plays a significant role in understanding the mechanisms of autoimmune diseases and the protective effect of certain MHC-II alleles.
Antigen presentation by major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) molecules is crucial for eliciting an efficient immune response by CD4(+) T cells and maintaining self-antigen tolerance. Some MHC-II alleles are known to be positively or negatively associated with the risk of the development of different autoimmune diseases (ADs), including those characterized by the emergence of autoreactive T cells. Apparently, the MHC-II presentation of self-antigens contributes to the autoimmune T cell response, initiated through a breakdown of central tolerance to self-antigens in the thymus. The appearance of autoreactive T cell might be the result of (i) the unusual interaction between T cell receptors (TCRs) and self-antigens presented on MHC-II; (ii) the posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of self-antigens; (iii) direct loading of the self-antigen to classical MHC-II without additional nonclassical MHC assistance; (iv) the proinflammatory environment effect on MHC-II expression and antigen presentation; and (v) molecular mimicry between foreign and self-antigens. The peculiarities of the processes involved in the MHC-II-mediated presentation may have crucial importance in the elucidation of the mechanisms of triggering and developing ADs as well as for clarification on the protective effect of MHC-II alleles that are negatively associated with ADs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据