4.6 Article

IQGAP1 Is a Phosphotyrosine-Regulated Scaffold for SH2-Containing Proteins

期刊

CELLS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12030483

关键词

Abl; IQGAP1; MET; phosphorylation; phosphotyrosine; receptor tyrosine kinase; scaffold protein; SH2; signaling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals a novel mechanism by which MET-catalyzed phosphorylation of IQGAP1 regulates its interaction with SH2-containing proteins, providing new insights into how IQGAP1 coordinates intracellular signaling.
The scaffold protein IQGAP1 associates with over 150 interactors to influence multiple biological processes. The molecular mechanisms that underly spatial and temporal regulation of these interactions, which are crucial for proper cell functions, remain poorly understood. The receptor tyrosine kinase MET phosphorylates IQGAP1 on Tyr(1510). Separately, Src homology 2 (SH2) domains mediate protein-protein interactions by binding specific phosphotyrosine residues. Here, we investigate whether MET-catalyzed phosphorylation of Tyr(1510) of IQGAP1 regulates the docking of SH2-containing proteins. Using a peptide array, we identified SH2 domains from several proteins, including the non-receptor tyrosine kinases Abl1 and Abl2, that bind to the Tyr(1510) of IQGAP1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Using pure proteins, we validated that full-length Abl1 and Abl2 bind directly to phosphorylated Tyr(1510) of IQGAP1. In cells, MET inhibition decreases endogenous IQGAP1 phosphorylation and interaction with endogenous Abl1 and Abl2, indicating that binding is regulated by MET-catalyzed phosphorylation of IQGAP1. Functionally, IQGAP1 modulates basal and HGF-stimulated Abl signaling. Moreover, IQGAP1 binds directly to MET, inhibiting its activation and signaling. Collectively, our study demonstrates that IQGAP1 is a phosphotyrosine-regulated scaffold for SH2-containing proteins, thereby uncovering a previously unidentified mechanism by which IQGAP1 coordinates intracellular signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据