4.5 Article

Comparison of factor structure models for the Beck Anxiety Inventory among cardiac rehabilitation patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 91-97

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.08.007

关键词

Anxiety; Beck Anxiety Inventory; Cardiac rehabilitation; Cardiovascular disease; Confirmatory factor analysis

资金

  1. Indiana State University
  2. University of Missouri Kansas City Department of Psychology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) experience greater rates of distress symptoms, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, than the general population. These psychological outcomes have been linked to greater risk for negative outcomes following a cardiac event; however, research examining the relationship between specific components of anxiety and outcomes in CVD is limited. Further, prior research has not investigated the structure of anxiety symptoms in CVD. This study sought to compare previously established one, two, and four-factor models of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in individuals enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Methods: Our sample included 208 individuals with CVD recruited during enrollment in a phase II CR program. Participants completed the BAI at enrollment in CR (Time 1) and again 12 weeks later at CR completion (Time 2, n = 151). Results: Consistent with prior literature, 41% of our sample reported at least mild symptoms of anxiety (BAI > 8), and the BAI proved to be a reliable measure within this sample (alpha = 0.89). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results indicated that a second-order model with four first order factors, consisting of cognitive, autonomic, neuromotor, and panic components, fit our data well. A multi-group CFA approach supported measurement invariance across time. Conclusion: These results suggest that anxiety following CVD can be evaluated based on cognitive, autonomic, neuromotor, and panic components as well as the encompassing anxiety construct. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据