4.7 Article

Prediction of Functional Outcome in Stroke Patients with Proximal Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions Using Machine Learning Models

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030839

关键词

ischemic stroke; machine learning; medical decision making; middle cerebral artery; artificial intelligence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using machine learning models and clinical, laboratory, and quantitative imaging data as inputs, we were able to accurately predict the short- and medium-term functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions.
At present, clinicians are expected to manage a large volume of complex clinical, laboratory, and imaging data, necessitating sophisticated analytic approaches. Machine learning-based models can use this vast amount of data to create forecasting models. We aimed to predict short- and medium-term functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions using machine learning models with clinical, laboratory, and quantitative imaging data as inputs. Included were consecutive AIS patients with MCA M1 and proximal M2 occlusions. The XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Random Forest were used to predict the outcome. Minimum redundancy maximum relevancy was used for selecting features. The primary outcomes were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) shift and the modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days. The algorithm with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting the favorable and unfavorable outcome groups at 90 days was LightGBM. Random Forest had the highest AUROC when predicting the favorable and unfavorable groups based on the NIHSS shift. Using clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters in conjunction with machine learning, we accurately predicted the functional outcome of AIS patients with proximal MCA occlusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据