4.7 Article

The Potential of Self-Assessment and Associated Factors for Delayed Symptomatic Hyponatremia Following Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Single Center Experience

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010306

关键词

self-assessment; hyponatremia; pituitary; transsphenoidal surgery; SIADH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this prospective study, we identified screening parameters and associated factors for delayed, symptomatic hyponatremia (DSH) following inpatient discharge after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). We found that female sex, lower BMI, nausea, and emesis were associated with DSH. Handing out a symptom questionnaire at discharge seems to be an easy and feasible tool for the detection of DSH after hospital discharge.
(1) Background: We identified screening parameters and associated factors for delayed, symptomatic hyponatremia (DSH) following inpatient discharge after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). (2) Methods: In this prospective, monocentric study, 108 patients who underwent TSS for pituitary pathologies were included, provided with a questionnaire and instructed to document urine specific gravity, fluid intake/urine output, body weight and clinical symptoms for every of five days following discharge from hospital. (3) Results: The overall incidence of DSH within 14 days following discharge from the hospital was 14.8% (n = 9). Symptomatic patients presented on average 8.6 days after surgery. Mild DSH was present in 3.3% of the patients, moderate in 1.6% and severe hyponatremia in 9.8% of patients. Female sex (p = 0.02) and lower BMI (p = 0.02), as well as nausea (66.7%; p < 0.01) and emesis (33.3%; p < 0.05), were associated with DSH. A significant weight delta between morning and afternoon weight two days before the event of DSH between both groups (1.26 kg (n = 5) vs. 0.79 kg (n = 52), p < 0.05) was detected. (4) Conclusions: Handing out a symptom questionnaire at discharge seems to be an easy and feasible tool for the detection of DSH after hospital discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据