4.7 Article

Improvement in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis on Switching from Bisphosphonates to Once-Weekly Teriparatide: A Randomized Open-Label Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010292

关键词

bone mineral density; bisphosphonates; glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis; fractures; teriparatide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the effect of switching to weekly teriparatide on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis patients. The results showed that switching to once-weekly teriparatide can increase bone mineral density and reduce the occurrence of new fractures.
This randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel study imitating real-world clinical practice assessed the effect of switching to weekly teriparatide in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) with a lumbar spine/proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) T-score <= -2.0 or <=-1.0 and a fragility fracture. Forty-four patients were randomized. The mean durations of the corticosteroid and bisphosphonate administrations were 90.0 and 51.3 months. The baseline BMD at L1-L4 was 0.828 and 0.826 g/cm(2) in Groups B (bisphosphonate) and T (teriparatide); at the femur (total), these values were 0.689 and 0.661 g/cm(2). The mean change in BMD was numerically higher with teriparatide vs. bisphosphonate but not statistically significant. The mean percentage changes from baseline in BMD at L1-L4 after a 72-week treatment were 0.5% and 4.1% in Groups B and T. The incidence of new fractures was higher in the patients taking bisphosphonates vs. those receiving once-weekly teriparatide at 72 weeks (18.2% vs. 11.8%) and 144 weeks (22.7% vs. 17.6%). The mean percentage change in femur (trochanter) BMD (0.035 [0.007-0.063]; p = 0.02) was significantly greater with teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates. Adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates. Switching to once-weekly teriparatide tended to increase lumbar spine BMD and reduce the occurrence of new fractures vs. bisphosphonates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据