Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The study aimed to compare the consistency of MRI interpretation of endolymphatic hydrops qualitative assessment of inner ear structures performed by independent observers. MRI with a delayed post-contrast 3D-FLAIR sequence was performed to visualize EH in patients suspected of having or diagnosed with MD. The scans were analyzed independently by three observers. In total, 220 ears were evaluated and, of these, 75 had definite MD, five probable MD, 67 with other Menieriform symptoms, and 73 were asymptomatic. Significant differences in cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (CoEH) grading between all observers were observed. On the Barath scale of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops (VEH), differences were found between the radiologists and otorhinolaryngologist in grading. No differences were noted in VEH on the Bernaerts scale and increased perilymphatic enhancement. Our study showed that evaluation of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops is repeatable between observers and easy to learn. It proved that Bernaerts' modification increased the sensitivity of EH diagnosis. Both parameters, CoEH and VEH, may serve as a differentiation method of EH from normal ears. The distinction between normal and hydropic ears is much easier to perform than EH grading. Therefore, it may be used to diagnose MD rather than EH staging.

Automated summary

The study aimed to compare the consistency of MRI interpretation of inner ear structures in patients suspected of having or diagnosed with Meniere's disease (MD). The evaluation of cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (CoEH) and vestibular endolymphatic hydrops (VEH) showed significant differences between observers. However, the modified Bernaerts scale increased the sensitivity of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) diagnosis. Differentiating between normal and hydropic ears was easier than grading EH, making it a useful method for diagnosing MD.