4.7 Article

Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Features of Choroidal Nevi in the Korean Population

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226666

关键词

choroidal nevus; multimodal imaging; choroidal malignant melanoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the clinical characteristics and multimodal imaging findings of choroidal nevi in the Korean population. It revealed that choroidal nevi in women were often larger and those with associated subretinal fluid were diagnosed at a younger age.
Choroidal nevus is a precursor of choroidal melanoma. Multimodal imaging has become vital in predicting the malignant transformation of choroidal nevi. This single-center, retrospective study analyzed clinical characteristics and multimodal imaging findings of 168 choroidal nevi (164 patients) of the Korean population. The mean age at presentation was 50 +/- 15 (range, 13-85) (women, n = 88 [53.7%]). Choroidal nevi (melanotic, n = 164 [97.6%]; postequatorial, n = 160 [95.2%]) were densely located between the optic disc and foveola (65.5%). The mean maximum linear basal diameter on fundus photography and thickness on optical coherence tomography were 2.97 +/- 1.51 mm and 521 +/- 297 mu m, respectively. On ultrasonography, the mean thickness was 0.87 +/- 0.60 mm. Choroidal nevi in women were associated with a higher maximum linear basal diameter (3.23 +/- 1.65 vs. 2.68 +/- 1.21 mm; p = 0.033) and age at diagnosis (52 +/- 14 vs. 47 +/- 16 years; p = 0.046) than those in men. Choroidal nevi with associated subretinal fluid (23.2%) presented with larger basal diameter (p = 0.049) and thickness on B-scan and optical coherence tomography (p < 0.001), but a younger age at diagnosis (p < 0.001) than those of dry nevi. This multimodal imaging study of choroidal nevi revealed some distinct characteristics, including topographic distribution, sex-related differences, and a younger age at diagnosis of nevi with fluid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据