4.7 Review

Angina in 2022: Current Perspectives

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236891

关键词

stable angina; coronary artery disease; nitrates; beta-blockers; calcium channel blockers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angina is the main symptom of ischemic heart disease, which can be caused by both epicardial coronary stenoses and coronary vasomotor disorders. Antianginal medications have been proven effective in improving symptoms, quality of life, and prognosis, but should be tailored to individual patient history and potential drug interactions.
Angina is the main symptom of ischemic heart disease; mirroring a mismatch between oxygen supply and demand. Epicardial coronary stenoses are only responsible for nearly half of the patients presenting with angina; whereas in several cases; symptoms may underlie coronary vasomotor disorders; such as microvascular dysfunction or epicardial spasm. Various medications have been proven to improve the prognosis and quality of life; representing the treatment of choice in stable angina and leaving revascularization only in particular coronary anatomies or poorly controlled symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. Antianginal medications aim to reduce the oxygen supply-demand mismatch and are generally effective in improving symptoms; quality of life; effort tolerance and time to ischemia onset and may improve prognosis in selected populations. Since antianginal medications have different mechanisms of action and side effects; their use should be tailored according to patient history and potential drug-drug interactions. Angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries patients should be phenotyped with invasive assessment and treated accordingly. Patients with refractory angina represent a higher-risk population in which some therapeutic options are available to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life; but robust data from large randomized controlled trials are still lacking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据