4.8 Article

β-Endorphin mediates radiation therapy fatigue

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 50, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn6025

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [PO1 CA163222, R01AR043369]
  2. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  3. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  4. Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office [OTKA FK138696]
  5. STIA-KFI grant from Semmelweis University
  6. EU [739593]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatigue is a common adverse effect of radiation therapy in cancer patients. This study suggests that skin-derived beta-endorphin plays a role in radiation-induced fatigue, and opioid antagonism may be a potential treatment for this condition.
Fatigue is a common adverse effect of external beam radiation therapy in cancer patients. Mechanisms causing radiation fatigue remain unclear, although linkage to skin irradiation has been suggested. beta-Endorphin, an endogenous opioid, is synthesized in skin following genotoxic ultraviolet irradiation and acts systemically, producing addiction. Exogenous opiates with the same receptor activity as beta-endorphin can cause fatigue. Using rodent models of radiation therapy, exposing tails and sparing vital organs, we tested whether skin-derived beta-endorphin contributes to radiation-induced fatigue. Over a 6-week radiation regimen, plasma beta-endorphin increased in rats, paralleled by opiate phenotypes (elevated pain thresholds, Straub tail) and fatigue-like behavior, which was reversed in animals treated by the opiate antagonist naloxone. Mechanistically, all these phenotypes were blocked by opiate antagonist treatment and were undetected in either beta-endorphin knockout mice or mice lacking keratinocyte p53 expression. These findings implicate skin-derived beta-endorphin in systemic effects of radiation therapy. Opioid antagonism may warrant testing in humans as treatment or prevention of radiationinduced fatigue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据