4.8 Article

Leaf economics fundamentals explained by optimality principles

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add5667

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The life span of leaves is positively correlated with their mass per unit area (LMA), but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. By analyzing large leaf trait datasets, we found that this empirical generalization is a result of natural selection, which maximizes average net carbon gain over the leaf life cycle. We demonstrated how evergreen and deciduous species with different construction costs (assumed proportional to LMA) are selected by light, temperature, and growing-season length in predictable ways. Moreover, we explained the observed divergent latitudinal trends in evergreen and deciduous LMA and showed how local distributions of LMA arise from selection under different environmental conditions acting on the species pool. These findings highlight how optimality principles can contribute to a new theory for plant geography and terrestrial carbon dynamics.
The life span of leaves increases with their mass per unit area (LMA). It is unclear why. Here, we show that this empirical generalization (the foundation of the worldwide leaf economics spectrum) is a consequence of natural selection, maximizing average net carbon gain over the leaf life cycle. Analyzing two large leaf trait datasets, we show that evergreen and deciduous species with diverse construction costs (assumed proportional to LMA) are selected by light, temperature, and growing-season length in different, but predictable, ways. We quantitatively explain the observed divergent latitudinal trends in evergreen and deciduous LMA and show how local distri-butions of LMA arise by selection under different environmental conditions acting on the species pool. These results illustrate how optimality principles can underpin a new theory for plant geography and terrestrial carbon dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据