4.8 Article

Local changes in microtubule network mobility instruct neuronal polarization and axon specification

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 44, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo2343

关键词

-

资金

  1. EMBO long-term fellowship [EMBO ALTF 407-2017]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-Graduate program project) [022.006.001]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [819219]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [819219] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the importance of microtubule network mobility in the process of neuronal polarization, which is regulated by Rho GTPase signaling and extracellular cues. The differences in microtubule mobility determine the ability of Kinesin-1 to enter specific neurites, thus affecting the polarization specificity of neurons. These findings provide new insights into the cytoskeletal mechanism of neuronal polarization.
The polarization of neurons into axons and dendrites depends on extracellular cues, intracellular signaling, cytoskeletal rearrangements, and polarized transport, but the interplay between these processes during polarization remains unresolved. Here, we show that axon specification is determined by differences in microtubule network mobility between neurites, regulated by Rho guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) and extracellular cues. In developing neurons, retrograde microtubule flow prevents the entry of the axon-selective motor protein Kinesin-1 into most neurites. Using inducible assays to control microtubule network flow, we demonstrate that local inhibition of microtubule mobility is sufficient to guide Kinesin-1 into a specific neurite, whereas long-term global inhibition induces the formation of multiple axons. We furthermore show that extracellular mechanical cues and intracellular Rho GTPase signaling control the local differences in microtubule network flow. These results reveal a novel cytoskeletal mechanism for neuronal polarization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据