4.8 Article

Critical soil moisture thresholds of plant water stress in terrestrial ecosystems

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 44, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq7827

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council Synergy project [SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  2. ANR CLAND Convergence Institute
  3. CNES [5100019800]
  4. European Research Council funding under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [787203 REALM]
  5. LEMONTREE (Land Ecosystem Models based On New Theory, observation and Experiments) project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantifies plant water stress using global eddy covariance observations and identifies differences in water stress across different biomes. The results contribute to future climate and water resource projections, highlighting the importance of understanding the spatial distribution of plant water stress.
Plant water stress occurs at the point when soil moisture (SM) limits transpiration, defining a critical SM threshold (theta(crit)). Knowledge of the spatial distribution of. crit is crucial for future projections of climate and water resources. Here, we use global eddy covariance observations to quantify.crit and evaporative fraction (EF) regimes. Three canonical variables describe how EF is controlled by SM: the maximum EF (EFmax), theta(crit), and slope (S) between EF and SM. We find systematic differences of these three variables across biomes. Variation in theta(crit), S, and EFmax is mostly explained by soil texture, vapor pressure deficit, and precipitation, respectively, as well as vegetation structure. Dryland ecosystems tend to operate at low theta(crit) and show adaptation to water deficits. The negative relationship between theta(crit) and S indicates that dryland ecosystems minimize.crit through mechanisms of sustained SM extraction and transport by xylem. Our results further suggest an optimal adaptation of local EF-SM response that maximizes growing-season evapotranspiration and photosynthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据