4.6 Article

High-Tap-Density Sulfur Cathodes Made Beyond 400 °C for Lithium-Sulfur Cells with Balanced Gravimetric/Volumetric Energy Densities

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 772-779

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02313

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22005251, 22005315, 22179109]
  2. Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees [cx2018027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By synthesizing high-tap-density microsphere cathodes and utilizing conformal silica packaging, the energy density of lithium-sulfur cells can be improved and the limitations in cathode engineering and phase conversion kinetics can be addressed. The resulting cathodes demonstrate excellent performance and stability, offering new opportunities for the development of other electrode materials.
Lithium-sulfur cells application is hindered by imbalanced gravimetric/ volumetric energy densities (EG/EV) in pouch cells, owing to constraints in cathode engineering/compactness and Li2Sn phase-conversion kinetics. By mimicking ternary oxide cathodes, a synthetic route beyond 400 degrees C is proposed to make high-tap-density (maximum 2.12 g cm-3) microsphere cathodes, where sulfur and NiFe2O4 quantum-dot catalysts are sealed in N-rich carbon shells. Conformal silica package proves critical to elevate cathode thermotolerant limit over sulfur sublimation temperature and block sulfuric vapor loss, enabling polymeric carbonization and high sulfur content retention (similar to 70.3%). The quantum dots and enclosed N-rich carbon help shorten the electrical resistance, anchor Li2Sn molecules, and boost their phase conversions. Such cathodes exhibit high reversible capacities, great sulfur utilization, and cyclic behaviors. Packed pouch cells show balanced EG/EV and good bendability under high sulfur loading and lean-electrolyte conditions. Our strategy may offer new opportunities for other broad electrodes with low pack density and thermal instability challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据