4.3 Article

Encapsulation of plum biowaste extract: design of alginate beads by response surface approach

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-023-01826-7

关键词

Hydrophilic compounds; Biowaste; Ionotropic hydrogel; Particle morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to recommend a preserving method of a natural plant extract for further food applications. Plum peel extract was used as active material source and encapsulated in alginate beads using ionic gelation. The optimized conditions for the highest encapsulation efficiency and antioxidant activity were determined to be 15% CaCl2, 1.44% alginate, and 18 min of hardening time. The beads showed perfect sphere morphology under microscope analysis but slightly deviated from perfect sphericity in shape analysis.
The aim of this study is to recommend a preserving method of a natural plant extract for further food applications. Plum peel extract was used as active material source, and extracted by automatic solvent extraction. Ionic gelation was used to encapsulate the plum peel extract in alginate beads. The process was subjected to Box-Behnken design of response surface method (Box-Behnken-RSM). The conditions of CaCl2 concentration, sodium alginate concentration and hardening time for the ionic gelation system was optimized to obtain the best responses (encapsulation efficiency and antioxidant activity). 15% CaCl2, 1.44% alginate and 18 min were the best conditions for the highest encapsulation efficiency (EE) in terms of total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity of the capsules. In vitro DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay was applied in order to measure the antioxidant activity of the beads. Furthermore, stereo-microscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were also used to analyze the morphology of the alginate beads. When the morphology of the obtained capsules was examined, it was observed that they were perfect sphere. However, it was determined that the samples were slightly far from perfect sphericity in the shape analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据