4.5 Article

Oncolytic virus-mediated p53 overexpression promotes immunogenic cell death and efficacy of PD-1 blockade in pancreatic cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-ONCOLYTICS
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 3-13

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2022.09.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [17ck0106285h001, 20ck0106569h0001]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K10596, JP21K07219, JP16H05416, JP19H03731]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated the potential of p53-expressing telomerase-specific oncolytic adenovirus OBP-702 in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adeno-carcinoma (PDAC). OBP-702 enhances the efficacy of PD-1 blockade therapy by inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD) and anti-tumor immune responses.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, provide improved clinical outcome in certain cancers. However, pancreatic ductal adeno-carcinoma (PDAC) is refractory to PD-1 blockade therapy due to poor immune response. Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel approach for inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD). We demonstrated the therapeutic potential of p53-expressing telo-merase-specific oncolytic adenovirus OBP-702 to induce ICD and anti-tumor immune responses in human PDAC cells with different p53 status (Capan-2, PK-59, PK-45H, Capan-1, MIA PaCa-2, BxPC-3) and murine PDAC cells (PAN02). OBP-702 significantly enhanced ICD with secretion of extracel-lular adenosine triphosphate and high-mobility group box pro-tein B1 by inducing p53-mediated apoptosis and autophagy. OBP-702 significantly promoted the tumor infiltration of CD8+ T cells and the anti-tumor efficacy of PD-1 blockade in a subcutaneous PAN02 syngeneic tumor model. Our results suggest that oncolytic adenovirus-mediated p53 overexpres-sion augments ICD and the efficacy of PD-1 blockade therapy against cold PDAC tumors. Further in vivo experiments would be warranted to evaluate the survival benefit of tumor-bearing mice in combination therapy with OBP-702 and PD-1 blockade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据