4.6 Article

Shortened telomere length in patients with depression: A meta-analytic study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 84-93

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.01.015

关键词

Depression; Meta-analysis; Stress; Telomere

资金

  1. Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPG8D1191]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Accelerated telomere shortening is associated with stress-related cell damage and aging. Patients with depression have been shown to have shortened life expectancy and to be associated with multiple age-related systemic diseases. Previous studies have examined leukocyte telomere length (LTL) in patients with depression, but have shown inconsistent results. Methods: We conducted meta-analyses by pooling relevant results strictly from all eligible case control studies for cross-sectional comparison of LTL between depressive patients and control subjects (16 studies involving 7207 subjects). The effect sizes (shown as Hedges' g) of each individual study were synthesized by using a random effects model. Results: Our analysis revealed telomere length is significantly shorter in subjects with depression in comparison to healthy controls (Hedges' g =-0.42, p =1 x 10(-5), corresponding to r =-021). Significant heterogeneity among studies examining LTL in subjects with depression was found (Q = 116.07, df = 16, I-2 = 86.21%, p < 1 x 10(-8)), which can possibly be explained by methods used in measuring telomere length (Q= 18.42, df = 2, p =1 x 10(-4)). There was no significant publication bias, nor moderating effect of age, female percentage, or illness duration of depression on synthesized results. Conclusions: Our results support the hypothesis that depression is associated with accelerated cell aging. Future studies are required to clarify whether the association is mediated through environmental stress, and whether effective treatment can halt cell aging. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据