4.7 Article

Enhancing the utilization of rapeseed protein ingredients in bread making by tailored lactic acid fermentation

期刊

FOOD BIOSCIENCE
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102028

关键词

Rapeseed protein; Sourdough bread; Dextran; Digestibility; Amino acids

资金

  1. EIT Food
  2. innovation community on Food of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
  3. European Union [20316 VALOCAKE]
  4. [18025 PROVE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of rapeseed protein isolate (RPI) or concentrate (RPC) as ingredients in composite wheat baking, both before and after lactic acid bacteria fermentation. The study found that fermentation could improve the textural properties of bread and increase its specific volume, as well as enhance the free amino acid profiles. However, fermentation of RPC may affect protein digestibility.
The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of rapeseed protein isolate (RPI) or concentrate (RPC) as such and after lactic acid bacteria fermentation as ingredients in composite wheat baking. Bread recipes were developed replacing wheat flour with RPI (10%) or RPC (20%) to obtain a high protein bread. Fermentation of the rapeseed protein ingredients with Weissella confusa A16 enabling synthesis in situ of dextran contributed to obtaining bread with improved textural properties. The in situ produced dextran in RPI (6.1% dry matter) and RPC (5.7% dm) increased the bread specific volume (10% and 14%, respectively) and decreased crumb hardness (35% and 25%, respectively) compared to the respective control breads. Furthermore, fermentation of RPC significantly improved the free amino acid profiles e.g., lysine, methionine, and isoleucine, which are deficient in wheat bread. Protein digestibility in vitro was significantly enhanced in the breads containing fermented RPI, but not in the one with fermented RPC, probably due to the higher level of condensed tannins in RPC after fermentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据