4.5 Article

Multi-stage cold energy recovery/utilization: A 10 MW class cold store with liquefied natural gas

期刊

ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 860-873

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.1373

关键词

cold energy recovery; cold store; heat exchange; liquefied natural gas; LNG regasification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates a new multistage cold energy recovery/utilization system that links the cold energy from liquefied natural gas (LNG) to supply coastal cold stores efficiently. The proposed system has advantages in terms of technology, economy, and environmental benefits, saving energy and reducing carbon emissions.
In coastal cities, a large amount of cold energy is released into the nearby seawater during the process of regasification of liquefied natural gas (LNG) at the receiving terminal, and meanwhile, a large amount of exported and/or imported foods need to be frozen by bulk cold energy near the sea. In this paper, a new multistage cold energy recovery/utilization system is investigated to link the LNG cold energy directly to supply the coastal cold store. This design uses a realistic case in Ningbo LNG receiving station in China, and for the very first time considers how to utilize the LNG cold energy in an efficient manner regarding the technical, economic, and environmental benefits. A three-stage LNG cold energy utilization system is designed and evaluated by considering different temperatures, pressures, and heat exchange parameters. Compared to conventional electric-driven cold stores, the proposed multistage cold energy recovery/utilization system has a much cheaper capital cost during the initial investment stage, and also avoids the utility power consumption during the daily operation period. In the case study, from Ningbo LNG receiving station to a 10 MW class cold store, the proposed multienergy system can save the energy of 20.05 kilotons of standard coal, and the carbon emission reduction is up to 1.49 x 10(8) kg per year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据