4.6 Article

Inhibitory Activity of Chitin, (2-Acetamido-2-Deoxy-Hexopyranose) against Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Staphylococcus aureus

期刊

COATINGS
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12121854

关键词

Caridina gracilirostris; Staphylococcus aureus; 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-hexopyranose; penicillin-binding protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibacterial compounds from aquatic sources have the potential to contribute to the treatment of drug-resistant infectious diseases. Chitin 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-hexopyranose from freshwater prawns showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Chitin films demonstrated their potential as effective antibiotics through molecular docking experiments.
Antibacterial compounds from aquatic sources have the potential to contribute significantly to the treatment of the ever-increasing drug-resistant infectious diseases. The chitin 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-hexopyranose from the freshwater prawn Caridina gracilirostris showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Two different types of chitin films, (1) chitin and starch, and (2) chitin, starch, and ascorbic acid were tested against S. aureus using in silico molecular docking. The inhibitory action of 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-hexopyranose was recorded against the penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a) of S. aureus. The chitin films exhibited their potential as an effective antibacterial agent through binding energy and ligand efficiency. Further, the inhibitory constant also indicated the potent antibacterial nature of the chitin films. The hydrogen bond interaction of chitin with PBP2a was with serine 49 and threonine 413, at 2.2 angstrom and 3.4 angstrom, respectively. The druggability of 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-hexopyranose showed good oral bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics properties were within a normal range. The chitin did not undergo any metabolism and appeared to be of a nontoxic nature. The 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-hexopyranose could be suggested as a novel drug against S. aureus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据