4.7 Article

Flexural, impact and dynamic mechanical analysis of hybrid composites: Olive tree leaves powder/pineapple leaf fibre/epoxy matrix

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.036

关键词

Olive tree leaves powder; Pineapple leaf fibre; Epoxy; Hybrid composites; Mechanical properties; Dynamic mechanical properties

资金

  1. King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)
  2. [RSP-2022R435]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this research is to investigate the suitability of olive tree leaves powder (OTL) as reinforcement in epoxy composites along with pineapple leaf fibre (PALF). The study found that increasing the proportion of PALF in the hybrid composites significantly improved impact strength, but the bending strength and flexural modulus were lower than the parent composites. DMA results showed that hybrid composites outperformed parent composites in terms of storage modulus, loss modulus, and damping factor.
The objective of this work is to determine the suitability of olive tree leaves powder (OTL) as reinforcement along with pineapple leaf fibre (PALF) in the epoxy composites. The parent and hybrid composites were fabricated using the hot press technique with the overall fibre loading at 40 wt% and OTL: PALF in the ratio of 50:50, 30:70 and 70:30, respectively. The fabricated composites were characterized using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), flexural and impact tests. As the proportion of PALF was increased in the hybrid composites, impact strength improved significantly. However, hybrid composites were not effective in withstanding the bending load where their bending strength and flexural modulus were lower than the parent composites. Hybrid composites outperformed parent composites with superior storage modulus, lower loss modulus and lower damping factor as per the DMA results. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据