4.2 Article

Impact of pulping routes of rice straw on cellulose nanoarchitectonics and their behavior toward Indigo dye

期刊

APPLIED NANOSCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-022-02714-0

关键词

Rice straw-based nanocellulose; Sulfate ester-containing nanocellulose; Carboxyl-containing nanocellulose; Particle dimension distribution; Stability; absorption indigo dye

资金

  1. Science, Technology, and Innovation Funding Authority
  2. [43068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between particle dimension distribution of nanocellulose particles and their efficiency as adsorbents, using different pulping reagents to prepare the nanocellulose and characterizing them through various methods. The results indicate that the pulping reagents have an effect on the particle dimension distribution.
This work deals with emphasizing the relation between particle dimension distribution of nanocellulose (PDD) particles with its efficiency as stabilizing/adsorbent agent of Indigo dye. In this respect, different pulping reagents were used in preparation of Rice straw pulps as precursors for nanocelluloses using acid hydrolysis and oxidizing agents [(KMnO4 and NH4)(2)S2O8] methods. The PDD was estimated by indirect method through processing the TEM images using the software ImageJ. The resulting nanocelluloses were also characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier-transform infrared spectra (FTIR) together with sulfate ester and carboxyl contents. The data showed the effective role of pulping reagent on PDD. The cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) from NaOH-AQ pulp, with the longest crystal length (204.4 +/- 107.8 nm) and the lowest diameter (6.7 +/- 2.3 nm), exhibited most stabilized suspension of dye; however, the highest adsorption capacity was accompanied the oxidized nanocellulose (Ox-NC) from neutral RS pulp with lowest PDD (4.98 +/- 1.6 and 90.5 +/- 3.14), together with highest COO content (476.46 mu mol/g).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据