4.7 Article

Archaeomagnetism in the Levant and Mesopotamia Reveals the Largest Changes in the Geomagnetic Field

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022JB024962

关键词

paleomagnetism; archaeomagnetism; geomagnetism; paleointensity; geomagnetic spikes; geomagnetic secular variations

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [804490]
  2. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1364/15]
  3. INSU-CNRS program PNP
  4. Dan David Foundation
  5. Mark Weissman
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [804490] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our understanding of the Earth's magnetic field intensity in the past has relied on paleointensity analysis. This study uses radiocarbon-dated archaeological materials from the Levant and Mesopotamia to construct a continuous curve of geomagnetic field intensity spanning 2500 years, providing unprecedented detail and resolution.
Our understanding of geomagnetic field intensity prior to the era of direct instrumental measurements relies on paleointensity analysis of rocks and archaeological materials that serve as magnetic recorders. Only in rare cases are absolute paleointensity data sets continuous over millennial timescales, in sub-centennial resolution, and directly dated using radiocarbon. As a result, fundamental properties of the geomagnetic field, such as its maximum intensity and rate of change have remained a subject of lively discussion. Here, we place firm constraints on these two quantities using Bayesian modeling of well-dated archaeomagnetic intensity data from the Levant and Upper Mesopotamia. We report new data from 23 groups of pottery collected from 18 consecutive radiocarbon-dated archaeological strata from Tel Megiddo, Israel. In the Near East, the period of 1700-550 BCE is represented by 84 groups of archaeological artifacts, 55 of which were dated using radiocarbon or a direct link to clear historically dated events, providing unprecedented sub-century resolution. Moreover, stratigraphic relationships between samples collected from multi-layered sites enable further refinement of the data ages. The Bayesian curve shows four geomagnetic spikes between 1050 and 600 BCE, with virtual axial dipole moment (VADM) reaching values of 155-162 ZAm(2), much higher than any prediction from geomagnetic field models. Rates of change associated with the four spikes are similar to 0.35-0.55 mu T/year (similar to 0.7-1.1 ZAm(2)/year), at least twice the maximum rate inferred from direct observations spanning the past 180 years. The increase from 1750 to 1030 BCE (73-161 ZAm(2)) depicts the Holocene's largest change in field intensity. Plain Language Summary The strength of Earth's magnetic field changes in an unpredictable manner. Understanding these changes requires precise information on how the field has changed in the past. Direct instrumental measurements of magnetic field intensity began in the 1840s, providing only a short time window into past intensity changes. Here, we explore the ancient field by analyzing a rare collection of radiocarbon-dated archaeological materials from stratified archaeological settlements and historically dated burnt structures in the Levant and Mesopotamia. We use new data from Tel Megiddo (Armageddon) to construct a continuous curve of geomagnetic field intensity spanning 2,500 years, with unprecedented detail and resolution. The curve depicts the evolution of a high-intensity anomaly, the largest change in intensity observed during the Holocene. Between 1750 and 1050 BCE, the field rapidly increased to values greater than twice those of today, much higher than any prediction derived from available geomagnetic field models. Subsequent oscillations between 1050 and 550 BCE, with extreme peaks, namely geomagnetic spikes, reveal change rates of at least twice as fast as the fastest change observed since the advent of direct measurements. Levantine archaeomagnetic data represent a case study in which archaeology provides crucial constraints on the geomagnetic field behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据