4.7 Article

Renal primary cilia lengthen in the progression of diabetic kidney disease

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.984452

关键词

diabetic kidney disease; primary cilia; renal tubular epithelial cell; ciliotherapy; therapeutic target

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
  3. [32141005]
  4. [82070741]
  5. [82270758]
  6. [81900657]
  7. [82200797]
  8. [2020J011243]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the number and length of renal cilia are significantly increased in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) patients, and are positively correlated with the severity of DKD. This finding was also confirmed in animal models. Therefore, renal cilia may serve as clinically relevant indicators and potential therapeutic targets for DKD.
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, and its early pathogenesis is critical. Shear stress caused by glomerular hyperfiltration contributes to the initiation of kidney injury in diabetes. The primary cilium of renal tubular epithelial cells (RTECs) is an important mechanical force sensor of shear stress and regulates energy metabolism homeostasis in RTECs to ensure energy supply for reabsorption functions, but little is known about the alterations in the renal cilium number and length during the progression of DKD. Here, we demonstrate that aberrant ciliogenesis and dramatic increase in the cilium length, the number of ciliated cells, and the length of cilia are positively correlated with the DKD class in the kidney biopsies of DKD patients by super-resolution imaging and appropriate statical analysis methods. This finding was further confirmed in STZ-induced or db/db diabetic mice. These results suggest that the number and length of renal cilia may be clinically relevant indicators and that cilia will be attractive therapeutic targets for DKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据