4.5 Article

Martian Meteoric Mg+: Atmospheric Distribution and Variability From MAVEN/IUVS

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022JE007315

关键词

Mars; Meteors; MAVEN; IUVS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the discovery of atmospheric Mg+ on Mars in 2015, continuous observations of this meteoric ion layer have been conducted. This study presents the most comprehensive observations of the persistent metal ion layer, showing that Mg+ appears under various conditions with peak densities varying between 100 and 500 cm(-3). Significant latitudinal variation within a season suggests that Mg+ is influenced by meteoric input distribution and/or atmospheric dynamics and chemistry. Counter-intuitive results, such as a reduction of Mg+ ions during Northern Winter in the northern hemisphere, are also observed.
Since the discovery of atmospheric Mg+ on Mars in 2015 by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution mission, there have been almost continuous observations of this meteoric ion layer in a variety of seasons, local times, and latitudes. Here, we present the most comprehensive set of observations of the persistent metal ion layer at Mars, constructing the first grand composite maps from pooled medians of subsamples of a metallic ion species. These maps demonstrate that Mg+ appears in almost all conditions when illuminated, with peak density values varying between 100 and 500 cm(-3), dependent on season and local time. There exists significant latitudinal variation within a given season, indicating that Mg+ is not simply an inert tracer, but may instead be influenced by the meteoric input distribution and/or atmospheric dynamics and chemistry. Geographic maps of Mg+ density as a function of latitude and longitude indicate the influence of atmospheric tides, and there is no apparent correlation with remnant crustal magnetic fields. This work also presents counter-intuitive results, such as a reduction of Mg+ ions in the northern hemisphere during Northern Winter in an apparent correlation with dust aerosols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据