4.6 Article

Genomic Characterization of Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST7 Isolates from a Case of Human Bacteremia in China

期刊

INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 7449-7457

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S385061

关键词

MRSA; ST7; whole genome analysis; livestock

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [LY21H190002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the analysis of MRSA strains from a patient with livestock association. Whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomic analyses revealed the correlation of these strains with the common ST7 lineage in retail meat and meat products in China. Additionally, presence of plasmid and prophage islands were identified. ST7 may originate from livestock and be transmitted in communities.
The detection of novel livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is important in both clinics and livestock. In this study, we report a MRSA-infected patient who was associated with livestock as a butcher, from whom we collected two MRSA strains FJ0318 and FJ0322. To further understand the correlation between these MRSA isolates and livestock, whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomic analyses were performed for these two isolates. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these two strains were homologous. Multilocus sequence typing showed that these two strains belong to ST7, which is a common lineage in retail meat and meat products in China. The genetic islands in FJ0318 and FJ0322 were different from those in other common clones, such as ST59, ST8, and ST5. A mosaic plasmid with a sequence identical to that of the plasmid pE2 from livestock was found in strain FJ0318. Additionally, a novel prophage island was identified on the chromosome. Furthermore, the sequence of the island was similar to that of phage SP6 identified in livestock. ST7 may originate from livestock and be transmitted to communities, causing invasive infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据