4.6 Article

Identification of a nucleotide metabolism-related signature to predict prognosis and guide patient care in hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1089291

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis; signature; nucleotide metabolism; treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a bioinformatics approach, 11 prognosis-related nucleotide metabolism genes were identified in hepatocellular carcinoma. A prognostic model containing six genes was constructed and found to accurately predict patient prognosis. The risk score generated from the model can be used as an independent prognostic factor and guide chemotherapy drug selection, as well as early patient care.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a highly malignant tumor with significant heterogeneity. Metabolic reprogramming plays an essential role in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Among them, nucleotide metabolism needs further investigation.Methods: Based on the bioinformatics approach, eleven prognosis-related nucleotide metabolism genes of hepatocellular carcinoma were screened in this study. Based on the Lasso-Cox regression method, we finally identified a prognostic model containing six genes and calculated the risk score for each patient. In addition, a nomogram was constructed on the basis of pathological stage and risk score.Results: Patients with high-risk score had worse prognosis than those with low-risk. The predictive efficiency of the model was efficient in both the TCGA dataset and the ICGC dataset. The risk score is an independent prognostic factor that can be used to screen chemotherapy drugs. In addition, the risk score can be useful in guiding patient care at an early stage.Conclusion: Nucleotide metabolism-related prognostic model can more accurately predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. As a novel prediction model, it is expected to help clinical staff to provide targeted treatment and nursing to patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据