4.7 Article

All-step-index-fiber spatiotemporally mode-locked laser

期刊

OPTICA
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 356-363

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.479206

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatiotemporal mode-locking (STML) has been extended into spatiotemporal dissipative solitons in multi-mode fiber (MMF) lasers. Previous STML in MMF lasers used graded-index (GRIN) MMFs. This study presents experimental and numerical observation of STML in an all-step-index (STIN) MMF laser, and proposes a mother-child coupling mechanism to understand the walk-off between mode-resolved pulses. The work enriches MMF laser architectures for STML in a previously unexplored parameter regime.
Spatiotemporal mode-locking (STML) in multi-mode fiber (MMF) lasers has extended the concept of temporal dissipa-tive solitons into spatiotemporal dissipative solitons. To date, all reported STML in MMF lasers has used graded-index (GRIN) MMFs either solely or hybridly with other fibers. Compared to GRIN MMFs, step-index (STIN) MMFs have much larger intermode dispersion on both group and phase velocities. Building all-STIN MMF lasers can provide a new platform to explore the spatiotemporal dissipative soliton dynamics. Here, we report experimental and numerical observation of STML in an all-STIN MMF laser. Distinct from GRIN MMF lasers, the large intermode dispersion in the all-STIN MMF laser cannot be balanced by Kerr nonlinearity, and significant walk-off between mode-resolved pulses was observed experimentally. Simulations suggest that this walk-off is counteracted by spatial coupling in the laser, and a mother-child coupling mechanism is proposed to understand it. This mother-child coupling can enable STML with a single repetition rate with infinitely large intermode dispersion. Our work enriches MMF laser architectures for STML in a parameter regime that has not been considered, to our knowledge. (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据