4.4 Article

A new species of Megalaria (Ramalinaceae, Ascomycota) from Thailand, and recognition of subgenus Catillochroma

期刊

MYCOKEYS
卷 -, 期 93, 页码 149-163

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.93.90962

关键词

Asia; lichens; mangroves; new taxa; tropical diversity

类别

资金

  1. The Field Museum
  2. National Research Council of Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes a new tropical species of lichenized fungi, M. pachaylenophila, and investigates its taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships using morphological and sequence data. The study also reveals a monophyletic group of the genus Catillochroma embedded within Megalaria at the subgeneric level.
Tropical regions harbor a substantial diversity of lichenized fungi, but face numerous threats to their per-sistence, often even before previously unknown species have been described and their evolutionary rela-tionships have been elucidated. Megalaria (Ramalinaceae) is a lichen-forming genus of fungi that produces crustose thalli, and includes a number of lineages occupying tropical rain forests; however, taxonomic and phylogenetic work on this clade is limited. Here we leverage both morphological and sequence data to describe a new species from the tropics, M. pachaylenophila. This taxon forms a crustose thallus, lacks secondary metabolites, and occurs in mangrove forests of Thailand. We supplemented molecular data from this species with data from other species, including two genera related to and occasionally included in Megalaria, namely Catillochroma and Lopezaria. Our analyses revealed Catillochroma species form a monophyletic group embedded within Megalaria, and we therefore recognize this clade at the subgeneric level. Since we only included the type species of Lopezaria in this study, we refrain from proposing a taxonomic conclusion for that clade at the moment. Several taxonomic combinations are made to reflect phylogenetic evidence supporting the inclusion of these species in Megalaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据