4.7 Article

A Trigger Signals Modification Scheme for Common-Mode Conducted EMI Reduction of Modular Multilevel Converter

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3199092

关键词

Common-mode (CM) current; conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI); modular multilevel converter (MMC); voltage to ground of submodule (SM)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51977093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, the characteristics of common-mode conducted EMI of MMC are analyzed, and a trigger signals modification scheme is proposed to effectively suppress the CM conducted EMI on the dc side without obviously affecting the operating performance of MMC. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the analysis and the proposed TSM scheme.
Modular multilevel converter (MMC), due to its features of modularization, high efficiency, and so on, has gradually become the mainstream multilevel converter. However, it can induce large electromagnetic interference (EMI) because of the high-level $dv/dt$ and $di/dt$ during its commutation transient. Therefore, it is significant to analyze the characteristics of common-mode (CM) conducted EMI of MMC and propose a suppression scheme accordingly. In this article, considering the voltage to ground of submodule (SM) as a direct noise source, the relationship between CM current and equivalent noise source of one phase, as well as that between the equivalent noise source of one phase and switching action of each SM are deduced. Furthermore, a trigger signals modification (TSM) scheme is proposed, which can effectively suppress the CM conducted EMI on the dc side without obviously affecting the operating performance of MMC. In particular, this scheme manipulates the trigger signals already generated by the modulation and capacitor voltage balancing control, thus enabling good applicability. Finally, experimental results verify the validity of the analysis and the effectiveness of the proposed TSM scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据