4.6 Review

A novel MYORG mutation causes primary familial brain calcification with migraine: Case report and literature review

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1110227

关键词

primary familial brain calcification; novel MYORG mutation; migraine; case report; literature review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case involves a 24-year-old woman with autosomal recessive primary familial brain calcification (AR-PFBC) associated with the MYORG gene mutation. The patient presented with migraine at 16 years old, and brain calcifications were observed in bilateral cerebellopontine nuclei, thalamus, basal ganglia, and radiocoronal area. This case highlights the pathological profile of the MYORG gene and emphasizes the importance of excluding brain calcifications in migraine patients with AR inheritance.
Primary familial brain calcification (PFBC) is a disorder in which pathologic calcification of the basal ganglia, cerebellum, or other brain regions with bilateral symmetry occurs. Common clinical symptoms include dysarthria, cerebellar symptoms, motor deficits, and cognitive impairment. Genetic factors are an important cause of the disease; however autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance is rare. In 2018, the myogenesis-regulated glycosidase (MYORG) gene was the first to be associated with AR-PFBC. The present case is a 24-year-old woman with AR-PFBC that presented with migraine at the age of 16 years. Symmetrical patchy calcifications were seen in the bilateral cerebellopontine nuclei, thalamus, basal ganglia, and radiocoronal area on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. AR-PFBC with migraine as the main clinical symptom is rare. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a compound heterozygous mutation in the MYORG gene, one of which has not been previously reported. Our case highlights the pathogenic profile of the MYORG gene, and demonstrates the need for exclusion of calcium deposits in the brain for migraine patients with AR inheritance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据