4.8 Article

Immune-related adverse events: A bibliometric analysis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1096806

关键词

immune-related adverse events; bibliometrics; VOSviewer; citespace; frontiers

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS)
  2. National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding
  3. [2020-I2M-CT-B-026]
  4. [2022-PUMCH-C-049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) research to map the basic knowledge structure including countries, institutions, authors, journals, and publications. The results showed that the United States, Japan, and China had the highest number of publications in this field, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy, and nivolumab were the most frequently used keywords.
BackgroundDespite providing clinical benefit, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a number of patients. This study explored the development pattern in irAEs research from a bibliometric perspective. MethodsWe obtained articles and reviews related to irAEs from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) (retrieved on September 13, 2022). Using the R package Bibliometrix, the main bibliometric features were calculated, and a three-filed plot was generated to show the relationship between authors, institutions, and topics. VOSviewer was used for co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence analysis and visualization. CiteSpace was used to detect burst references and keywords. ResultsA total of 3995 publications on irAEs were included. The United States (US), Japan, and China had the highest publications. The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer had the highest number of publications. In addition to immune-related adverse events, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy, and nivolumab were the most frequently used keywords. ConclusionsA bibliometric analysis of 17 years of irAEs research was conducted to map a basic knowledge structure including countries, institutions, authors, journals, and publications. The findings provided a comprehensive perspective on the broad future of this research area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据