4.3 Review

Exploring predisposing factors and pathogenesis contributing to injuries of donor lungs

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 11-12, 页码 1191-1203

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2022.2157264

关键词

Donor selection; lung injury; lung transplantation; marginal donor lungs; organ donation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82170107]
  2. Program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, China [202140406]
  3. Subject Leader Program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission [2022XD007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the predisposing factors contributing to injuries to the donor lungs, specifically focusing on the pathogenesis of these injuries and their impact on post-transplant outcomes. Additionally, various maneuvers to mitigate donor lung injuries have been proposed.
IntroductionLung transplantation (LTx) remains the only therapeutic strategy for patients with incurable lung diseases. However, its use has been severely limited by the narrow donor pool and potential concerns of inferior quality of donor lungs, which are more susceptible to external influence than other transplant organs. Multiple insults, including various causes of death and a series of perimortem events, may act together on donor lungs and eventually culminate in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after transplantation as well as other poor short-term outcomes.Areas coveredThis review focuses on the predisposing factors contributing to injuries to the donor lungs, specifically focusing on the pathogenesis of these injuries and their impact on post-transplant outcomes. Additionally, various maneuvers to mitigate donor lung injuries have been proposed.Expert opinionThe selection criteria for eligible donors vary and may be poor discriminators of lung injury. Not all transplanted lungs are in ideal condition. With the rapidly increasing waiting list for LTx, the trend of using marginal donors has become more apparent, underscoring the need to gain a deeper understanding of donor lung injuries and discover more donor resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据