4.6 Article

The Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Is an Efficient Pollinator for Paeonia lactiflora Pall in the Field

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13021179

关键词

pollination; behavior; efficiency; Apis mellifera; Paeonia lactiflora

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The herbaceous peony has high value as an ornamental and nutritional plant, and its seeds can be used to produce high-quality edible oil. However, the yield of peony seeds is limited, which can be improved by insect pollinators. In this study, we evaluated the pollination services of honeybees in a peony field and found that honeybees provided effective pollination for peonies, resulting in increased seed number and weight. DNA analysis showed that the pollen collected by honeybees was from peony flowers. These findings suggest that honeybees could be a suitable pollinator for peonies and can be applied in cultivation.
The herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) has high ornamental and nutritional value, and the seeds of P. lactiflora can be used to produce high-quality edible oil. However, low seed yield limits the application of P. lactiflora. This can be mitigated by insect pollinators. Here, we evaluated the pollination services of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) in a P. lactiflora field. We found that A. mellifera provided pollination for P. lactiflora throughout the day especially in the period from 10:00-15:00. Seed number and weight were significantly increased when P. lactiflora was pollinated by A. mellifera. Furthermore, a DNA barcode, the rbcL gene, was used to analyze pollen samples from the corbiculae (pollen baskets) of A. mellifera (bee pollen, BP) and P. lactiflora flowers (flower pollen, FP). High homology of rbcL genes in the BP and FP suggested that BP was collected from P. lactiflora. Based on our results, A. mellifera provided efficient pollination for P. lactiflora. Therefore, A. mellifera could be a good candidate pollinator for P. lactiflora and could be applied in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据