4.6 Article

Probabilistic Seismic Safety Assessment of Railway Embankments

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13010598

关键词

fragility curves; embankments; numerical modeling; soil cohesion; friction angle; IDA analysis; seismic assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research aims to investigate the seismic performance of railway embankments using a probabilistic approach. Nonlinear response history analyses were conducted using PLAXIS software, with more than 2400 embankment-earthquake case studies. Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify the most important variables in the seismic performance of railway embankments. Fragility curves were generated based on the mechanical properties of embankments, and incremental dynamic analysis approach was employed to develop fragility functions.
The purpose of this research is to study the seismic performance of railway embankments through a probabilistic approach. Nonlinear response history analyses were conducted utilizing PLAXIS software. Three categories of railway embankments were selected and more than 2400 embankment-earthquake case studies were performed. Sensitivity analyses were implemented to obtain the most important variables in the seismic performance of railway embankments. Finally, analytical fragility curves were generated in terms of the mechanical properties of railway embankments (e.g., soil cohesion and friction angle). Fragility functions were developed, employing an incremental dynamic analysis approach using a set of ground motions, including near- and far-field earthquakes. The maximum vertical displacement of the embankment was chosen as a damage index parameter. Fragility curves were derived for three damage states, including slight, moderate and extensive damage, with respect to threshold values proposed in the literature. The results of this study revealed that the mechanical properties of embankments could be considered one of the crucial uncertainty factors in seismic fragility analysis of railway embankments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据