4.6 Review

Metamodelling of Manufacturing Processes and Automation Workflows towards Designing and Operating Digital Twins

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13031945

关键词

manufacturing process; digital twin; workflow; technology classification; metamodelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The automation of workflows for the optimization of manufacturing processes through digital twins is achievable with the matured technologies of Industry 4.0. However, there is potential for further exploration of technologies like metamodelling languages. A framework utilizing an automation workflow knowledge database, technology classification, and metamodelling language is presented, highlighting its usefulness in creating digital twins for manufacturing processes while involving human input. Two process control paradigms are used to illustrate the applicability of the approach within the framework of certifiable human-in-the-loop process optimization.
The automation of workflows for the optimization of manufacturing processes through digital twins seems to be achievable nowadays. The enabling technologies of Industry 4.0 have matured, while the plethora of available sensors and data processing methods can be used to address functionalities related to manufacturing processes, such as process monitoring and control, quality assessment and process modelling. However, technologies succeeding Computer-Integrated Manufacturing and several promising techniques, such as metamodelling languages, have not been exploited enough. To this end, a framework is presented, utilizing an automation workflow knowledge database, a classification of technologies and a metamodelling language. This approach will be highly useful for creating digital twins for both the design and operation of manufacturing processes, while keeping humans in the loop. Two process control paradigms are used to illustrate the applicability of such an approach, under the framework of certifiable human-in-the-loop process optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据