4.6 Article

An Efficient Attention-Based Convolutional Neural Network That Reduces the Effects of Spectral Variability for Hyperspectral Unmixing

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app122312158

关键词

hyperspectral unmixing; convolutional neural network; endmember bundle; spectral variability; attention mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of hyperspectral unmixing is to obtain the spectral features and proportions of materials in a hyperspectral image. However, spectral variabilities make it difficult to accurately extract these features. To address this issue, this study proposes an efficient attention-based convolutional neural network and a convolution block attention module. Experimental results demonstrate that this method outperforms other unmixing methods.
The purpose of hyperspectral unmixing (HU) is to obtain the spectral features of materials (endmembers) and their proportion (abundance) in a hyperspectral image (HSI). Due to the existence of spectral variabilities (SVs), it is difficult to obtain accurate spectral features. At the same time, the performance of unmixing is not only affected by SVs but also depends on the effective spectral and spatial information. To solve these problems, this study proposed an efficient attention-based convolutional neural network (EACNN) and an efficient convolution block attention module (ECBAM). The EACNN is a two-stream network, which is learned from nearly pure endmembers through an additional network, and the aggregated spectral and spatial information can be obtained effectively with the help of the ECBAM, which can reduce the influence of SVs and improve the performance. The unmixing network helps the whole network to pay attention to meaningful feature information by using efficient channel attention (ECA) and guides the unmixing process by sharing parameters. Experimental results on three HSI datasets showed that the method proposed in this study outperformed other unmixing methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据