4.6 Article

Exploring Effective Bio-Cover Materials for Mitigating Methane Emission at a Tropical Landfill

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13031990

关键词

bio-cover; compost; landfill gas; methane oxidation; methanotrophs; tropical climate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane emission and oxidation in different bio-cover materials were studied at a landfill site in Thailand. The bio-cover was purged with landfill gas and methane reduction through biological oxidation was investigated. Methane emissions varied between media and were influenced by rainfall. The highest methane removals were found in sandy loam, followed by compost and stabilized wastes, with compost having the highest oxidation capacities and greater methanotroph population.
Methane emission and oxidation in different bio-cover materials, i.e., sandy loam, compost, and stabilized wastes, were investigated at a municipal solid waste landfill in Thailand. The bio-cover was purged with extracted landfill gas while methane reduction through biological oxidation was studied. The moisture content in bio-cover materials was maintained with natural rainwater during the wet period and leachate irrigation during the dry period. Methane emissions were found to vary between media and were influenced by rainfall. The methane loading rates of the bio-cover varied from 8.2-20.3 mol/m3/d, being higher during the dry period. Methane removal rates at the bottom part of the biofilter (0.4-0.6 m depth), the most active zone, were found to be from 6.4-10.9 and 7.8-11.4 mol/m(3)/d during wet and dry periods. The highest methane removals were found in the lower part of sandy loam, followed sequentially by compost and stabilized wastes. Nevertheless, compost had the highest methane oxidation capacities and greater methanotroph population compared to sandy loam and stabilized wastes. Methanotroph type I was found to predominate during the dry period, whereas methanotroph type II was predominant during the wet period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据