4.6 Review

Assessment and Categorization of Biological Effects and Atypical Symptoms Owing to Exposure to RF Fields from Wireless Energy Devices

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13031265

关键词

electromagnetic fields; radiofrequency exposure; biological effects; atypical symptom; categorization; evaluation methodologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, the general public and workers are exposed to environmental electromagnetic fields generated by radiofrequency wireless communication systems. This exposure can have direct biological effects and personal symptoms, as well as indirect effects on healthcare appliances. This article analyzes the consequences of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields emitted by radiofrequency devices, evaluates their effects and symptoms, and discusses evaluation methodologies.
Nowadays, environmental electromagnetic fields exist everywhere and the whole population is exposed. The most widespread technologies engendering exposure to electromagnetic fields for the public and workers are radiofrequency wireless communication systems. Such exposure can have direct effects on living tissue involving biological problems or personal symptoms, as well as indirect effects restricting healthcare appliances. This assessment aims to analyze, examine and categorize the consequences of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields emitted by radiofrequency devices. This concerns biological effects in living tissues and atypical personal symptoms for short and long-term exposures. The evaluation methodology in this field of investigation is also discussed. In the article, these consequences as well as their evaluation techniques, in the case of wireless digital communication tools, are analyzed and reviewed. The categorization of exposure sources, the corresponding effects and their assessment methodologies are analyzed. The concept of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and their applications in various assessments of these effects and symptoms are reviewed and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据