4.6 Article

A Systematical Comparison of Catalytic Behavior of NM/γ-Al2O3 (NM = Ru, Rh, Pt, Pd, Au, Ir) on 1,2-Dichloroethane Oxidation: Distributions of By-Products and Reaction Mechanism

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13010036

关键词

1; 2-DCE; noble metal; catalytic oxidation; gamma-Al2O3; by-products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducts a systematic comparison of various typical noble metal catalysts and explores the potential for CVOC destruction, providing an overall view of their universal applicability for practical use.
Featured ApplicationThis work supplies a systematical comparison study on various typical noble metal catalysts with an exploration of the potential for CVOC destruction, which would supply an overall view of universal applicability for the practical operation of noble metals.Understanding the reaction path and mechanism of chlorinated volatile organic compound (CVOC) destruction is important for designing efficient catalysts, especially for the application of noble metal-based materials. Herein, several typical noble metals, Ru, Rh, Pt, Pd, Au, and Ir, supported on gamma-Al2O3 catalysts were synthesized by the hydrazine hydrate reduction method for 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE) elimination. Various character measurements were conducted, and the results suggest that the high-valence state of noble metals is beneficial for the 1,2-DCE reaction as it enables the enhancement of the mobility of the surficial active oxygen species of catalysts. Among the noble metals, Ru/gamma-Al2O3 expresses superior catalytic reactivity, with a 90% pollutant conversion rate at 337 & DEG;C, and competitive CO2 selectivity, 99.15% at the temperature of total oxidation. The distribution of by-products and the degradation routes were analyzed online by GC-ECD and in situ diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy, which may provide helpful insight for the future application of noble metal-based catalysts for CVOC elimination in industrial fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据