4.6 Article

Energy-Exergy Analysis of Diesel Engine Fueled with Microalgae Biodiesel-Diesel Blend

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13031857

关键词

energy; exergy; biodiesel; diesel engine; analysis; sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renewable energy is gaining more attention due to the depletion of fossil fuel reserves. In this study, Spirulina microalgae were used as feedstock for biodiesel production. Energy and exergy analysis were conducted on a diesel engine using different fuel blends. The results showed that the exergy efficiency of pure diesel was higher than that of biodiesel blends. The study also found that the engine's sustainability index was associated with exergy efficiencies.
Renewable energy is getting more attention in recent times due to the rapid depletion of fossil fuel reserves. Production and consumption of biofuels derived from biomass has significantly increased. In the present work, Spirulina microalgae have been chosen as feedstock for biodiesel production. Diesel and biodiesel were mixed in different volumetric ratios to prepare fuel blends (SBF0, SBF20, SBF40, SBF60, SBF80, and SBF100). Energy and exergy analysis has been performed on a four-stroke, single-cylinder diesel engine. Experimentation was done under varying loads at 1500 RPM. The effect of multiple loads and blends was investigated for brake power (BP), cooling water losses (Q(w)), exhaust gas losses (Q(exh)), and unaccounted losses (Q(un)). Pure diesel SBF100 has the highest and lowest exergy efficiencies, respectively equaling roughly 31.65% and 29.75%. It has been observed that BP and Q(w) increase with the increase in load whereas Qexh and Qun show a decreasing trend. It was also observed that with an increase in blending, Qw increases while Qexh decreases. In the exergy analysis, it was observed that the exergy destruction rate has a maximum fraction of input exergy values of 46.01% and 46.29% for Diesel and SBF20 respectively. The system engine sustainability index was in the range of 1.27 to 1.46, which is directly related to exergy efficiencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据