4.6 Article

Customizing a Cognitive Stimulation Program for Individuals with Dementia through a Participatory Design Approach

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app122211612

关键词

participatory design; dementia; cognitive stimulation; technology

资金

  1. Portuguese national funding agency for science, research, and technology through NOVA LINCS [UIDB/04516/2020]
  2. LARSyS [PTDC/CCI-COM/31046/2017]
  3. INTERREG program [MAC2/1.1b/352]
  4. BRaNT project [PTDC/CCICOM/31046/2017, SFRH/BD/145919/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a participatory design approach to develop a customized cognitive stimulation program for individuals with dementia using Musiquence. The program is based on preferences gathered from formal caregivers and individuals with dementia, and guidelines are provided for content development.
(1) Background: Different intervention strategies, such as reminiscence and music-based therapies, effectively mitigate the cognitive decline of individuals with dementia (IwD). An important challenge when implementing these approaches lies in the need for content customization. We designed Musiquence platform, a framework that allows the customization of music and reminiscence content in cognitive stimulation activities. (2) Methods: Here, we present a participatory design methodology for designing a seven-week customized cognitive stimulation program (CCSP) for IwD using Musiquence. We ran focus groups with 19 formal caregivers, who provided information regarding themes and music to be used in activities for IwD, and gathered preferences from 20 IwD. (3) Results: The CCSP consists of seven cycles of tasks combining the activities available in Musiquence, the seven preferential themes of IwD, and the seven songs most frequently referenced by formal caregivers. (4) Conclusions: Finally, we provide a set of guidelines to implement a participatory design approach for content development together with IwD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据