4.8 Article

Treat the Untreatable by a Photothermal Agent: Triggering Heat and Immunological Responses for Rabies Virus Inactivation

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202205461

关键词

antivirus; immunological effects; organic photothermal agent; photothermal therapy; rabies virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a method combining photothermal therapy and photothermally triggered immunological effects for effective post-exposure prophylaxis and treatment of rabies. The designed photothermal agent reduces the virus level at the site of infection and inhibits its transfer to the brain. The survival ratio of mice is increased through intracranial injection and laser irradiation.
Rabies is a fatal neurological zoonotic disease caused by the rabies virus (RABV), and the approved post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) procedure remains unavailable in areas with inadequate medical systems. Although strategies have been proposed for PEP and postinfection treatment (PIT), because of the complexity of the treatment procedures and the limited curative outcome, developing an effective treatment strategy remains a holy grail in rabies research. Herein, a facile approach is proposed involving photothermal therapy (PTT) and photothermally triggered immunological effects to realize effective PEP and PIT simultaneously. The designed photothermal agent (N+TT-mCB nanoparticles) featured positively charged functional groups and high photo-to-heat efficiency, which are favorable for virus targeting and inactivation. The level of the virus at the site of infection in mice is significantly decreased upon treatment with orthotopic PTT, and the transfer of the virus to the brain is significantly inhibited. Furthermore, the survival ratio of the mice three days postinfection is increased by intracranial injection of N+TT-mCB and laser irradiation. Overall, this work provides a platform for the effective treatment of RABV and opens a new avenue for future antiviral studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据